Hey, do you happen to follow the conflict over the Technocracy Inc. article on Wikipedia? It's...interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Technocratic_movement

We already have a thread about that. It is tragic, I think. I mean, of all "technocrats" available, the least serious and efficient one is in some way claiming to represent the "true technocracy", denouncing everything after the Study Course.

EDIT: Added the link to the original thread.

Post edited by: lupus664, at: 2007/06/05 07:52

I consider the whole issue really of minor interest, one is always going to have those that disagree with you and wikipedia lends itself to this style of conflict as part of its very design ethos.

Let us not get too distracted by such things if my motto.

Well, since someone is trying to deny our existence and make it the official truth, we ought to engage.

If you notice, they are operating within the limits of the site rules, as such if we want to be as offical, we have to learn how to make full use of the system, and accept its limitations.

Wikipedia after all, is not all that, I would rather there was no mention of us, than something negative at the very least.

As we learn what is needed to make ourselves heard, we can at future times come back and within the rules, edit things and be more visible.

Let us not get too hung up on not getting our own way all the time just because someone outsmarted us in a medium we are unfamilar with and did not fully understand how to use.

Someone who got a site named after himself whacked...

The wiki article should present accurate information as it is a public interface to technocracy. Unfortunately we have one user causing trouble so we do need a team to maintain it correctly.

Two persons got blocked from writing there recently.

do you want my help? i could fix 'ur problem in two secs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy_%28bureaucratic%29

Post edited by: Avanti, at: 2007/06/14 11:17

Avanti, I doubt that any such action would do us any good. It's best to leave out of these conflicts and focus on something constructive. But we'll keep in mind that you're our man to do any dirty work. Just kidding. Really.